Administrators & Leadership
- Decision support
- Enrollment forecasting
- Budget optimization
- Strategic planning
- Performance dashboards
I teach data science and AI at the university level, and I build AI systems as a consultant. So when a department brings me a problem, I'm not learning how higher ed works on your dime. I already live in it.
That matters more than it sounds. A lot of ed-tech fails because it was designed by people who've never graded 120 papers, sat on an accreditation committee, or written a grant. I have.
The result is usually less flashy and more useful: tools that fit how faculty actually work, and that respect the things universities can't trade away.
Faculty spend countless hours collecting and reporting data for AACSB, ABET, SACSCOC, and other bodies.
Automated collection and reporting that extracts metrics from existing systems, generates documentation, and maintains continuous compliance with real-time dashboards.
Institutions struggle to identify at-risk students early enough for effective intervention.
Predictive analytics that flag at-risk students from academic, behavioral, and engagement patterns, enabling proactive intervention earlier than traditional methods.
Faculty face overwhelming grading demands that limit time for meaningful student interaction.
Intelligent grading assistance that provides initial assessments, feedback suggestions, and consistency checks while preserving faculty oversight and final decisions.
Limited advisor availability and inconsistent information create barriers to effective guidance.
AI advising tools offering personalized course recommendations, degree-progress tracking, and scheduling assistance based on goals, requirements, and performance.
Reviewers increasingly expect serious AI methods, and a proposal without them can look dated.
Expert consultation on research design, custom model development, and AI methodologies that strengthen proposals, with knowledge of NSF, NIH, and other agencies.
Keeping content current and engaging for diverse learners challenges time-strapped faculty.
In-classroom AI consultation to create adaptive materials, personalized exercises, and intelligent teaching assistants that support diverse learning styles.
Institutions face pressure to optimize enrollment amid demographic shifts and changing preferences.
Predictive enrollment models that forecast yield, identify high-potential prospects, and optimize recruitment, with scenario planning for strategy.
Institutions face financial pressure with limited resources and competing priorities.
Resource-optimization analysis of spending patterns to identify efficiencies and recommend allocations based on priorities and outcomes data.
Assessing curriculum relevance and alignment with industry needs requires extensive analysis.
Curriculum analytics that assess program effectiveness, identify skills gaps vs. industry demand, and recommend updates based on outcomes and employment trends.
Five areas I'm asked about again and again on campus.
Transform accreditation from a periodic burden into a continuous, efficient system for AACSB, ABET, SACSCOC, and other bodies.
Enhance research capability and grant competitiveness with expert AI consultation and custom model development for academic projects and funding proposals.
Statistically valid datasets that preserve privacy for sensitive research.
Combine text, image, and numerical data with custom models.
Identify relevant studies and synthesize findings faster.
Transform your classroom with personalized AI consultation and implementation designed for university faculty in the New River Valley.
Maintaining standards while enhancing learning.
Rigorous data protection and consent.
AI that serves all students equitably.
Enhancing rather than replacing judgment.
Streamline administrative processes and enhance decision-making with AI designed for higher-education management and operations.
Optimize recruitment, admissions, and yield with data-driven solutions for an increasingly competitive landscape.
Built around faculty governance and the academic calendar, not against them.
Understand your institution's structure, culture, systems, and challenges through stakeholder interviews, a systems and data inventory, and a readiness evaluation that respects academic values.
Co-create solutions with faculty, administrators, and IT that integrate with academic workflows, using design-thinking workshops, architecture, and stakeholder validation.
Develop and test prototypes with real users in your environment, refining based on feedback before full rollout.
Roll out with careful change management and role-based training so faculty and staff can use the new capabilities effectively.
Ongoing support, monitoring, and optimization. Regular reviews keep the solution valuable as your needs and AI evolve.
Our models go beyond off-the-shelf solutions to address the specific requirements of research projects across STEM, humanities, and the social sciences.
Models trained on field-specific data for relevance and accuracy in your domain.
Hybrid methods that integrate AI with traditional approaches to strengthen proposals.
Technical expertise to strengthen the AI/ML components of NSF, NIH, and other proposals.
As both an active professor in information systems and an AI consultant, Dr. Bradberry brings a perspective few consultants can offer: solutions that understand and respect the academic environment.
First-hand understanding of faculty workflows, research needs, and academic governance.
Bringing AI from concept to production in complex institutional environments.
Direct experience with grant writing, research design, and scholarly publication.
First-hand experience with AACSB, ABET, and regional accreditation from the academic side.
AI in a classroom touches student privacy, fairness, and academic integrity. These aren't afterthoughts in my work; they shape what I'm willing to build.
Our consultation includes reviewing your design, recommending methodologies, developing proof-of-concept models, crafting technical narratives, and budgeting AI components.
It's a comprehensive service tailored to faculty: an initial assessment of your teaching and challenges; a custom solution design for your content and discipline; implementation support integrated with your LMS; faculty training including academic-integrity best practices; and ongoing optimization through the semester. Common applications include AI teaching assistants, assignment generation, rubric-based grading, personalized learning paths, and engagement monitoring.
It varies by scope and scale. Typical engagement models:
Many implementations can be partially or fully grant-funded, and we can assist with proposal development for educational-technology projects.
Privacy and FERPA compliance are paramount: FERPA-compliant architecture designed from the ground up; role-based access control with audit logs; data-protection measures including end-to-end encryption; policy integration with your governance frameworks; and student-rights management for access and consent. We work closely with your IT security and privacy officers throughout.
Integrated components work together: a data-integration hub connecting LMS, SIS, and assessment platforms; a standards-mapping engine that maps data to AACSB/ABET/SACSCOC standards and flags gaps; documentation generation formatted to accreditor requirements; real-time dashboards for continuous monitoring; and faculty-qualification tracking. The result is a continuous, manageable process rather than a periodic crisis.
Several roles: predictive enrollment analytics forecasting yield and identifying prospects; early-warning systems flagging at-risk students; personalized student support with 24/7 AI advising for routine questions; and strategic planning using market and demographic trends. Together they enable proactive, data-driven, personalized support at scale.
Whether it's accreditation paperwork, a research method, or a class that's grown too big to grade, tell me about it and I'll give you an honest read.